Conquer the Web

We Test, Synthesize and Share the Latest Internet Marketing Tactics and Strategies to Help You Better Run Your Online Business

Google, Yahoo or Natural Search — Which Provides the Best Quality Visitors?

November 8th, 2006 by Mike Reining Read more about Articles

We asked our­selves this ques­tion recently and decided to com­pare buy rates across one of our pop­u­lar sites.

Here’s what we found on ana­lyz­ing 100,000 visitors.

Nat­ural Search

4.51% of vis­i­tors find­ing us through nat­ural search (typ­ing in a key­word on Google and click­ing on our site in the search results) made a purchase.

Google Adwords

4.00% of vis­i­tors from Google Adwords made a pur­chase. Less than nat­ural search — but not much less. Google adver­tis­ing works and it shows!

Now let’s com­pare Google to Yahoo.

Yahoo (for­merly Over­ture) Ads

A mere 3.30% made a pur­chase from Yahoo. Per­haps because Yahoo ads look MORE like ads than Google’s way of dis­play­ing ads. Google adver­tis­ing pro­duced bet­ter vis­i­tors — vis­i­tors more will­ing to buy.

But before you aban­don Yahoo — keep this in mind — pre­cisely because Yahoo pro­duced lower qual­ity vis­i­tors they have less adver­tis­ers for you to com­pete with. So you’ll find that bid­ding for the same key­words on Yahoo is often much cheaper than Google.

Com­par­ing the Cost per Sale for Google and Yahoo

We were pay­ing 0.17 cents per click on Google

and 0.15 cents per click on Yahoo.

This means it cost us $4.25 to make a sale on Google while $4.54 to make a sale on Yahoo. The cost per sale was only mar­gin­ally higher for Yahoo.

Yahoo of course — deliv­ers less traf­fic. only 30% of our sales from PPC clicks come from Yahoo. The rest come from Google Adwords.

But if you are ignor­ing Yahoo — you could be ignor­ing 30% of your market.

This is why you should never aban­don your Yahoo ads.

It’s also for this rea­son that we decided to include a chap­ter on Yahoo in our new book. Just get­ting on the Yahoo band­wagon can help you boost your sales by 30%.

Last 5 posts by

About the Author

Mike Reining Prior to MindValley Media, Mike was the Head of New Ventures Strategy at eBay where he conceived of the strategies that led to the investment in Craigslist, the launch of Kijiji.com and the acquisition of Skype. Mike has an MBA from Stanford and previously worked for the Boston Consulting Group. He is also a certified Google AdWords Professional.

Check out other posts by Mike Reining

If you want to see what's in the private lab...

Ask yourself... which part of your business would you most like to improve?

I can send you 7 tactics related to your specific needs, if you like.

You don't have to buy anything, just take it as a backstage pass into our private course.

Will it give you the solution you've been waiting for?

There's only one way to find out.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to “Google, Yahoo or Natural Search — Which Provides the Best Quality Visitors?”

  1. Jim

    The thing that actu­ally sur­prised me the most from this post was the cost per click on both google and yahoo. I’m curi­ous as to how you were able to keep your cost per click so low but were still able to get almost 100,000 vis­i­tors. Were most of your clicks from long tail search terms or were they just low default bids or not highly sought after terms?

  2. vishen

    good point — we get such low bid rates for two reasons:

    1. we started adver­tis­ing early — way back in Dec 2002 and our cam­paigns have a his­tory. We kept fine-tuning our per­for­mance over the years and boost­ing our CTR rates.

    2. We use adwords.clickmuse.com — our own inven­tion. It’s free for now so try it. Adwords let’s be revise and inno­vate on our ads much bet­ter than before. Since using it we man­aged to boost AVG CTRs by close to 40% and fur­ther bring down bid prices from 18 cents to 16 cents. And that’s just over the last 4 months.

Leave a Reply